In this article we have answered some questions like what are the Advantages and disadvantages of technocracy? and What is an example of technocracy? the term technocracy refers to a significant governance model in which professional decisions are made by people commonly known as the ‘elite’. It refers to people who have the greatest wealth and status in society, the most successful or most powerful group of people.
Technocrats make decisions and hold higher government positions. These individuals are recruited and recruited to serve people based on their technical expertise and background in public service and their knowledge enables them to be highly regarded as “part of a strong technical elite” who champions the primacy of tech professionals.
Who Invented Technocracy?
Technocracy was invented by William H. Smith who has been recognized for his work in understanding, researching and analyzing public institutions, including public administration roles in government since he was an engineer in California. He coined the word “technocracy”, which reveals the essence of the technocrat.
Related Article: Technocrats meaning and importance
It is very imperative to note that technocracy differs from traditional administrative and democratic models in that people elected to leadership roles are elected through a process that emphasizes their skills and proven achievements. Technocracy‘s position is based on what someone has put forward, not whether or not they meet the majority interest criteria that give them a popular vote.
Advantages of Technocracy
Technical expertise enables technocrats to communicate better with those who share the same expertise in government departments or other related organizations.
Technocratic reforms have been generally well received by donors and are embedded in a range of internationally supported aid and incentive programs. As such, it helps poor countries continue to receive international financial aid.
Another potential benefit is that the design and implementation of a technocratic reform program
can build cohesion and trust across the country, strengthen political capital over time, and improve the functioning of government. When a state has technocrats in leadership positions, people have trust in the government knowing that the people in those positions are experts and knowledgeable about what they have to do and that their expertise will bear fruits.
Disadvantages of Technocracy
The actions and decisions of technocrats can conflict with the will, rights, and interests of those they control. This often leads to populist opposition to both the policy-making of specific technocrats and the scope of power accorded to technocrats in general. It contributes to the emergence of a powerful, entrenched, and inexplicable oligarchy technocracy, the populist notion of a “deep state.”
Technocrats possess expertise that the general public lacks, and therefore often disobey the will of the people. Technocrats may or may not be responsible for the will of the people for such decisions, and in most cases, act without considering the will of the people.
In governments where citizens are guaranteed certain rights, technocrats seek to interfere with those rights when they deem their expertise appropriate or in the broader public interest. There is a possibility. A focus on the principles of science and engineering can also be seen as disconnected and disconnected from the humanity and nature of society. For example, technocrats may make decisions based on data calculations rather than influencing populations, individuals, or groups within populations.
Regardless of who and how they appoint technocrats, there is always the risk that technocrats will get involved in policies that put their interests, or the interests of those they serve, above the public interest. Technocrats are inevitably put in a position of trust. Because some of the knowledge to make their decisions is not available to the public or is incomprehensible. This creates a high-risk situation for self-dealing, collusion, corruption, and nepotism. Economic issues such as rent-seeking, rent-extraction, or regulatory capture are normally pervasive in technocracy.